The Impact Of Ignorance On Human Morality - 2174 Words

The Impact of Ignorance on Human Morality in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 Ignorance is bliss, or so people say. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. has a different view on ignorance stating â€Å"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.† The ignorance King describes is the ignorance that divided a nation. This ignorance allowed African Americans and other minorities to be mistreated years after they won their freedom and equality; this ignorance exists to this day. As explained by Dr. King, Ignorance is dangerous. Ignorance causes people to not only be illogical but, as in this case, also be immoral or inhumane. Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 creates a world where ignorance does not only interfere with knowledge but also the basic concept of humanity. In Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury uses the characterization of Beatty, Mildred, and Montag to illustrate that in order to be moral a person has to avoid ignorance and pursu e knowledge. Even though Beatty was introduced to books, he is unable to truly understand them and instead embraces ignorance. When the firemen arrive at the book martyr’s home Beatty attempts to interrogate the martyr saying â€Å"‘Enough of that! Where are they?’ He slapped her face with amazing objectivity and repeated the question,† (Bradbury 33). This quote shows the lack of morality in Beatty because of his ignorance. Beatty slaps this woman without hesitating or Cochran 2 showing any sort of emotion. He is able toShow MoreRelated Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis Essay1238 Words   |  5 PagesDeath). Clearly, external surroundings affect perceptions of fear as well as human nature in general. Although C.S. Lewis published the novel, Out of the Silent Planet, over three centuries after Bacon wrote his theory on fear, Lewis similarly portrayed external surrounding to manipulate perceptions of fear. From the first chapter of the novel, Lewis revealed fear to be a weakness that leads to ignorance. It was this ignorance that apparently fueled the cycle of corruption and immorality on â€Å"The SilentRead MorePlatos View of Conventional Morality853 Words   |  3 Pagesmajor influence on the daily activities of society. It is very difficult for humans to act in a rationale manner at all times. Further complicating the issue is the very idea of rationale behavior. The term in itself is quite subjective and can easily be interpreted in nume rous ways. Due to the emotional influence on many of the decisions of society, I tend to agree with the view of conventional morality. I do believe humans intentionally do wrong due in part to their emotional instability. We as societyRead MoreThe Characterization Of Hamlet By William Shakespeare1009 Words   |  5 PagesHamlet’s (1601) theatrical power propagates from its timeless rendering of the human condition. William Shakespeare illustrates a sympathetic protagonist caught between the tensions of Renaissance and traditional ethics, who suffers due to the fundamental ignorance of individuals to the truth by the facade of deceit and theatricality. Correspondingly, director and critic Nicholas Hytner summarises, â€Å"†¦at the center of the play is a man desperately concerned with the nature of truth and desperatelyRead More The Separation of Church and State in America Should NOT Be Absolute 949 Words   |  4 PagesReligion is the most influential factor in human society. It is the core of our existence and has become a way of life in all cultures. The impact religion has had on the United States is overwhelming. This country was founded on the principle of Christianity. Thomas Jefferson drafted the Declaration of Independence, and James Madison articulated our countries constitution with the belief that the Christian faith would establish and govern this great society. Merriam-Websters online dictionaryRead MoreThe Duke And The King915 Words   |  4 Pagesduke and the king joined Huck, the novel was, for the most part, peaceful; however, â€Å"with the introduction of the duke and the dauphin, the novel s idyll curdles† (Updike). Because the duke and the dauphin provide a negative example of morality, expose the ignorance of the American public, and aid in Huck’s overall maturation they play a critical role throughout the novel. The duke and the dauphin are first introduced as liars claiming to be people that they are not; until Huck leaves them, the twoRead MoreComparison Between 1984 And Fahrenheit 4511404 Words   |  6 Pages‘villain’. With reference to these characters and evaluation of their morality in relation to three key branches of normative ethical theory – namely deontological ethics, virtue ethics and care ethics– this essay will explore this statement, in addition to the flaws inherent within moral absolutism and the subsequent need for a degree of moral ambiguity in fiction. Deontology is an ethical theory which assesses the morality of an act, and by extension the individual committing the act, based onRead MoreExamples Of Satire In The Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn1183 Words   |  5 PagesHuck and Jim eventually find out that Jim’s owner had died and left it in her will that Jim should become free. Due to this turn of events, Jim was a free slave rather than a runaway slave. Mere summarization of the story does little to express the impact of Mark Twain’s deft application in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. It is instead Twain’s use of satire through humor, hyperboles, and irony that communicate Twain’s message. Throughout this novel, Twain employs humor to gain and hold the reader’sRead MoreHuman Nature : Good Or Evil1053 Words   |  5 PagesHuman Nature: Good or Evil All ideologies, including some economic ideologies, produce theories of human nature in order to establish fundamental human rights and to establish a more productive form of government. Human nature refers to the distinguishing characteristics of humans, including ways of thinking, feeling and acting; it is the moral principles that construct certain standards of behavior, which every person is entitled to simply because they are a human being. Many philosophers such asRead MoreTragic Circumstances, Social Pressures, and Flaws in Shakespeares MacBeth957 Words   |  4 Pagestragic circumstance, social pressures and flaws within the individual’s character. Shakespeare manipulates these features of a tragedy to evoke audience interest leaving responders with insightful thoughts about human nature such as the dangers of vaulting ambition, the fragility of human morality and the temptation of deviation from the natural order. Early in the play, Shakespeare portrays different representations of Macbeth’s ambitious nature and personality to responders through the use of effectiveRead MoreUtilitarianism can be used to describe the reasons why healthcare should be made available900 Words   |  4 Pages(Wilson). For Mill, pleasure is the prime motivator, and all beings must seek out maximum pleasure for themselves and others. This principle can be used to judge the morality of healthcare policies in terms of how they provide access to healthcare for the greatest number of people. In order to make the claim that healthcare is a human right is not sufficient; we must then be able to justify its expansion by illustrating its benefits (Wilson). In order for healthcare to be supported by utilitarianism

The United States Of American History - 954 Words

If you’ve ever been on vacation with my family, you know we’ll stop at a historic site without a doubt. Living in Virginia, a state chock-full of American history, it’s common to turn down the wrong road and stumble upon a battlefield or historical landmark. We’ve travelled up and down the east coast, as far north as Ellis Island in New York and as far south as the â€Å"90 Miles To Cuba† monument in Key West. When I got my first camera in middle school, I began to take pictures of the places we’d go, mostly the ever popular, ‘lie on the floor and put subject in focus’ pictures. Rather reflecting in a moment, I was saving it for later. I believe I was four years old during my first visit to the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C. At this time, in the entryway of the National Museum of American History, hung the Star Spangled Banner flag, a 30 x 42 United States flag. It hung for over 30 years in the hall. After wear and tear, it has lost some 8-foot length of the stripes. Still, I remember standing at nearly three and a half feet, feeling so small before the flag. Its radiance and its size, have been rooted in my memory ever since. I returned years later with my camera in hand, ready to take on the museum and the flag that once awe struck me. I don’t remember much about that trip with the camera and all the photos I took. It is clear that taking those photos brought me out of the museum experience. It is common now that my family and I will take pictures and continue on throughShow MoreRelatedThe American Journey : A History Of The United State861 Words   |  4 Pages In 1860s, due to the fact that southern states desired to maintain the slavery while the North wanted to ban the slavery, then the Union which was leaded by Abraham Lincoln fought with the Confederacy which was conducted by Jefferson Davis, and the Union hoped to achieve a goal that preserved the unity. However,because the South owned a large number of troops, controlled wide geographic extent, and had a powerful government, it was difficult for the Union to defeat the Confederacy thoroughly.FurthermoreRead MoreThe American Journey : A History Of The United States866 Words   |  4 Pagesopportunities for trade and settlement overseas. Spain, Portugal, France, and England all want to grasp the political, economic, and religious domination in Europe, and their conflict also carried to the Americas (Goldfield, e d., The American Journey: A History of the United States, P4). Competition for land areas, settlement, trade, and exploration led to the growth of imperialism and the economic system of mercantilism. Spain was the first nation that colonized the Americas. Spain tried to find aRead MoreAmerican Imperialism : A Part Of United States History1463 Words   |  6 PagesAmerican Imperialism American Imperialism has been a part of United States history ever since the American Revolution. Imperialism is the practice by which large, powerful nations seek to expand and maintain control or influence on a weaker country. Throughout the years, America has had a tendency to take over other people s land. Authors like Frederick Jackson Turner, Alfred Thayer Mahan, Albert J. Beveridge, Mark Twain, and William James all distinctive perspectives on U.S expansion and imperialismRead MoreAfrican American History Is A Vital Part Of The United States982 Words   |  4 PagesAll histories are an important subject to teach in every academic levels; however, African American history is a vital part of the United States. America would not be the country she is today without the accomplishments of the slaves and founding African American scholars. Slavery brought about incredible trials and established perseverance with the African American population that future generations need to know a bout and learn from. History teaches us our errors and our successes; furthermore,Read MoreThe Mexican American War : An Important Part Of United States History Essay1928 Words   |  8 PagesMany historians consider the Mexican-American war to be an important part of United States’ history. It allowed the young nation to uncover what their true values were and come into its potential as a world power. The Mexican-American war cemented the United States’ role as a world power as the people banded together and put aside differences to secure the supremacy of their way of life. It expanded the values of the American society beyond parochial lives and improved the overall quality of lifeRead MoreAdham Elnashai United States History During the Civil War and the American Revolution Americans1300 Words   |  6 PagesAdham Elnashai United States History During the Civil War and the American Revolution Americans didn’t only have to deal with their national policies, they also had to deal with their international relations with the rest of the countries in the World. The relations with other countries are also known as Foreign Policies. The overseas dimensions reflected onto the Civil War and Revolution Era. In 1861, 11 states seceded from the United States to form the Confederate States of America and overRead More The Ethnicity of Mexians in the United States Essay1738 Words   |  7 PagesThe Ethnicity of Mexians in the United States For centuries, Mexican Americans have dealt with an enormous amount of hardships that date back to their early Aztec roots. The source of many problems in Mexican American history can be traced in the pre-colonial period, before the United States of America was even conceived. Major problems of this era in history not only affected the Aztecs, but also the following generations of Aztec and Mexican descent, and continue to have an impact on their descendentsRead More The Chicano Movement: Struggles, Goals, and Accomplishments Essay examples1537 Words   |  7 PagesIn American history, civil rights movements have played a major role for many ethnics in the United States and have shape American society to what it is today. The impact of civil rights movements is tremendous and to an extent, they accomplish the objectives that the groups of people set out to achieve. The Mexican-American Civil Rights Movement, more commonly known as the Chicano Movement or El Movimiento, was one of th e many movements in the United States that set out to obtain equality for Mexican-AmericansRead MoreThe United States : A World Leader And Its Responses Will Have Key Consequences1693 Words   |  7 PagesFrom the mid-20th to the early-21st century, the United States faced many conflicts, pressures, and changes that were brought about by events and issues which occurred outside of American borders. In response, there was no way for the nation to avoid becoming more globalized. Globalization came in the form of economic, social, and political pressure on the country. Some of these shifts in policy and world view were brought on by necessity such as the energy crisis of the 1970’s. Others were by choiceRead MoreWomen in World War 2888 Words   |  3 PagesMost Americans know the iconic picture of Rosie the Riveter, depicted as a strong and independent young women working to help the war effort. It was 1941 and the United States finally entered World War II. Most propaganda of the United States encouraged the average women to join the workforce and help with the war effort. With men fighting abroad, it was only necessary for women to start working and leave their normal lives of being a mother and wife. The War Department of the United States emphasized

“With Liberty and Justice for All” Free Essays

An opinion of the social inequality that exists as it pertains to Gay Marriage Aimee L. Vroman Strayer University Online Introduction to Sociology SOC 100-015016 Professor Paul Humenik August 22, 2010 Abstract In recent years, the debate over same-sex marriage has grown from an issue that occasionally arose in a few states to a nationwide controversy. Indeed, in the last five years, the debate over gay marriage has been heard in the halls of the U. We will write a custom essay sample on â€Å"With Liberty and Justice for All† or any similar topic only for you Order Now S. Congress, at the White House, in dozens of state legislatures and courtrooms, and in the rhetoric of election campaigns at both the national and state levels. Moreover, the battle over whether gays and lesbians should be allowed to wed shows no signs of abating. In the last year alone, three states have banned same-sex marriage and four states have legalized the practice. The time for debate is now over. The issue of gay marriage is not one of religious degradation, social erosion, or even ethical breakdown. It is an issue of inalienable rights guaranteed to all citizens of this country. The fact that our federal government does not recognize gay marriages is an atrocity and shameful at best. â€Å"The foundation to gay rights will ultimately be seen as the right to marry, because with that right firmly established in law, most other forms of discrimination could not be justified. † (Bidstrup, Why Gays Should Be Allowed To Marry, 1996) When we as a society look outwards, we see everything that we can do to help other societies attain our level of justice, personal and financial success, freedoms, and everything else that comes with our knowledge and perseverance. However, if we as a society were to look inward at ourselves (something that I am confident that only a small percentage of our society is willing to do) and at our society as a whole, would we see it in a different light? Would we see that even after fifty years of civil rights and equal opportunity that we still oppress and treat some groups of our society as second class citizens? Our country’s Bill of Rights has been modified by Constitutional Amendments to say the each and every American citizen has certain inalienable rights. The right to be married is one that we Americans hold near and dear to our hearts. Why then, is this particular right denied to the gay community? One of the biggest and loudest arguments against gay marriage in this country is that it is against God and that it is against what it says in the Bible (The Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve argument). Yes, this country was founded on Christian principles and laws that were perceived to be fair to all of its citizenry. However, this is not the seventeen hundreds nor is it the time of the Inquisition. This is the so called Modern Era, in which not only technology and finance are supposed to be upgraded and ever changing for the better but also societal acceptance of people that are different from what we perceive as mainstream and the societal norm. How can there be societal justice for the gay community when we as a society, who proclaim ourselves to be enlightened and forward thinking, deny even this most basic of rights to the gay community? The answer is simple; there can be no societal justice for the gay community in this aspect. What if we were to turn the tables on society and tell everyone that is not a part of the gay community that their marriages, civil unions, and other forms of partnership were invalid and no longer existed in the eyes of the government? There would be a societal upheaval. Anarchy would ensue and the government would be dismantled by the people. Later, when the people had decided that there had been enough chaos, reformed by the people and for the people. The only reason this has not happened with the gay community is because they are the minority in this case. For centuries of our country’s history, we have been guilty of oppressing and even enslaving the minorities within our society, to say nothing of denying them the inalienable rights called for in our own Constitution. Over time, those minorities that have fought and fought hard for these rights have eventually been afforded these rights by Constitutional Amendments. Yet still, here we sit in the twenty-first century, and we still cannot see past our own biases and our deep rooted fears of anything that is different or contrary to us. At the end of the day, our opposition to gay marriage stems ultimately from a deep-seeded homophobia in our culture and society, borne almost entirely out of religious prejudice. While many of us do not realize that homophobia exists to the extent that it does, it is a very real part of every gay person’s life, just like racism is a very real part of every African American’s life. It is there, it is pervasive, and it has far more serious consequences for our society than most of us realize, not just for gay people, but for society in general. This religious prejudice comes from several well known entities. Those entities include, but are not limited to, the Catholic Church, the Mormon Church, the American Family Association, and Focus on the Family, and the most conservative of Protestant sects. Together with their various political subsidiary groups, a whole host of smaller right-wing political and religious organizations, and a few out-right hate groups, they are shaping national and local policy towards the gay community. They spend millions of dollars twisting and deforming referendums, propositions, and other local instruments of law solely for the purpose of fear mongering to scare the populace into line at the polls. It is these kinds of tactics being employed that are outdated and flat out wrong in the moral and ethical sense. They say that money corrupts; well the proof is in the proverbial pudding. The fear mongering turns into unparalleled hate and it is fueled by these so called â€Å"Christian† organizations. This is contrary to the Christian way of life and contrary to the convictions of a Christian. Hatred by itself, dressed up as religious dogma has been used for so long that it is beginning to lose its effectiveness (eventually people begin to figure out that it is mostly a tactic for filling pews, collection plates and campaign coffers more than it is a way of reforming lost souls and improving society), so the more clever of these organizations have begun to move onto a slick propaganda effort based on that long-time favorite winner, fear (Bidstrup, Gay Marriage: The Arguments and Motives, 2009). The time for rhetoric and Bible thumping is over. Our country had its time of religious revolution. It is now time for every person, regardless of gender, race, religious belief, or sexual orientation, to be given the rights that our laws and traditions provide. This idea has been the cornerstone of our society and our nation for hundreds of years. â€Å"We cannot accept the view that Amendment 2’s prohibition on specific legal protections does no more than deprive homosexuals of special rights. To the contrary, the amendment imposes a special disability on those persons alone. Homosexuals are forbidden the safeguards that others enjoy or may seek without constraint. (Kennedy, Stevens, O’Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, amp; Breyer, 1996) In the Supreme Court opinion that this quote is taken from, it says very plainly that a state (Colorado in this case) cannot prevent any group of persons from taking part in any public or private transaction. Though this case was hotly debated over the next fifteen years, Colorado in 2007 passed a law prohibiting any discrimination against homosexuals. Now if one state can do this and then another and then another, why is it so hard for our federally elected officials to do the same thing? The only answer that I can give is the activists, hate groups, and church lobbyists that throw millions of dollars into the coffers of our Senators and Congressman. This dirty money ensures that once again they will get elected and that once again they will vote to keep the gay community as second class citizens. This state of affairs is unacceptable. The time for change is now. Freedom is the right of every American regardless of gender, race, religious affiliation, and sexual orientation. It is high time that we, as a society, stand up and say in one unified voice, â€Å"This is wrong and we are not going to stand for it any longer! Works Cited Bidstrup, S. (2009, June 3). Gay Marriage: The Arguments and Motives. Retrieved August 19, 2010, from Bidstrup. com: http://www. bidstrup. com/marriage. htm Bidstrup, S. (1996, December 4). Why Gays Should Be Allowed To Marry. Retrieved August 18, 2010, from Bidtrsup. com: http://www. bidstrup. com/hawaii. htm Kennedy, A. M. , Stevens, J. P. , O’Connor, S. D. , Souter, D. H. , Ginsburg, R. B. , amp; Breyer, S. G. (1996, October 20). Supreme Court Bound Volume 517. Retrieved August 18, 2010, from United States Supreme Court: http://www. supremecourt. gov/opinions/boundvolumes/517bv. pdf How to cite â€Å"With Liberty and Justice for All†, Papers

Australian Law Rights and Freedoms

Question: Discuss about the Australian Law for Rights and Freedoms. Answer: Introduction This case has three parties, Fresh Farms, the agent Mr. Will and a Malaysian importer, Diary To Go. It is about actual and implied authority of Mr. Will. The laws in application here are based on the principles laid out in the Agency law. The formation of laws in many countries including Australia has been based on English law , therefore, precedents and practices from countries with similar law systems are followed in Australia as well. There are certain interpretations of law which are studied and analyzed keeping in view the current case. Legal considerations precedents Here, the complexity has arisen because the agent appointed by Fresh farms has gone out of his expressed authority to agree upon a contract with an overseas importer Diary to Go. When a company (principal) employees an agent, there are two types of authority the agent enjoys in Australian law, actual authority and implied authority. Actual authority is linked to the oral or written contract carried out between the principal and the agent. It lays out all the authority and responsibilities of the agent which have been mutually agreed upon, whereas in terms of implied authority, it is the unwritten or oral authority an agent enjoys based on the common practice. It is decided upon the common expectation in the role the agent has been hired for. It is implied that the agent enjoys authority, which has been in practice in the past on the same role. For established businesses and roles, this is quite simple to outline, however, for a newly devised role/company, this becomes problematic. A widely studied case in this area is Watteau v Fenwick. In the said case, the principal Fenwick had hired an agent, who went beyond his actual authority and sold cigars to third party. After a dispute, the 3rd party went on to sue Fenwick. In the case, Fenwick at the time of transaction was undisclosed as such by the agent to the 3rd party. However, it was a usual practice for Fenwick to sell cigars. Therefore, the court ruled that the principal in this case was liable and it should have stopped the agent manifestly via a written contract. The court concluded that as it was common practice by Fenwick, letting them off responsibility could potentially mean that companies may stop taking responsibility of actions of agents and in cases, make secret contract with agents to split money. The merits of this decisions are still discussed almost worldwide. However, the concept of estopped also seems relevant in this case. In conclusion, the concept is, that principal cannot object to the ag reement made by an agent, if at the time the principal could have stopped agreement over the confusion of authority. The application on current case In light of the discussion above there are two conclusions that could be made. The answers to the questions depends on implied authority/practice. The case study does not present any evidence or discussion with regards to implied authority. Since it is a well-established business there will be other agents and their contracts/practices can be examined. In case those agents have not in the past made such agreements beyond their express authority, Fresh farms has a strong case of getting contract between Mr. Will and Diary to go, null and void, and Mr. Will shall not be entitled to the 5% commission. Furthermore, on breach of authority, Mr. Wills contract with Fresh Farms (principal) could also be termed null and void. However, if these contracts are coming under the umbrella of common practice then both contracts between Mr. Will and Fresh Farms and the one made by Mr. Will and Diary to go will be enforceable by law. There is another scenario where these both contracts can be null and avoid. Fresh Farms proves that it wasnt aware/able to stop Mr. Will because of conditions which cannot be categorized as neglect or partial consent. In common terms partial can be termed as looking the other way, when something beneficial is being conducted. Typically a case of estopped has to meet three conditions. If there are any intentional or neglect from the principal, estopped is not applied. The 3rd party has appeared to act in good faith and there is no apparent chance of any malpractice from them, estopped will not be applied. A detrimental change has occurred on 3rd party which was caused by the said agents apparent authority. In the current scenario, when there was a gap of around 6 months between the signing of contract and start of contract between Mr. Will and Fresh Farms, the application of estopped looks likely. Because of this rather long period, Fresh Farms could be found guilty of neglect or working with the agent. The Fresh Farms should have acted earlier to stop the contract but it did not until the importer has tried to end the contract signed between him and Mr. Will because it was able to obtain similar products at a lower cost. Conclusion Apparently, the chance of getting out of both contracts remains on proving that Mr. Wills act were not common practice. His actions have not been the norm in the organization and rather he acted out of self-interest rather than on Fresh Farms shared interest. Estopped seems likely for the organization and all three parties i.e. Farm Fresh, Mr. Will and Diary to Go are still legally liable to fulfill the contents on the contract. It is a case where if a court considers the contracts null void, it would mean that the agent could act on the impression that he is an agent of Fresh Farms and harm 3rd party clients. Courts protection is based on the principle to emphasize on the responsibility of the principal. However, in this case the 3rd party is getting the wrong end of a bad deal due to negligence of the principal. In a legal battle, this factor may also be against Fresh Farms. To summarize, it could be stated: Is the contract between Fresh Farms and Diary to go is valid? It is valid, unless Fresh Farms can prove Mr. Wills act was not under implied authority as well as expressed authority. Is Mr. Will eligible for 5% contract? This depends on the answer of the 1st If Mr. Will acted outside of his expressed and implied authority, he will not get his 5% contract otherwise he is eligible for the 5% contract. Termination of Mr. Wills contract will be dependent on the answer of 1st question and content of his contract with Fresh Farms. There is a need to understand the terms signed and what does it presents about breach of authority (either implied or actual). Only then a specific judgment can be made. References Australian law reform Commission, Rights and freedoms under the common law, (2014) https://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/rights-and-freedoms-under-common-law Davenport, Shayne and David Parker,Business and Law in Australia(Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia, 2nd Ed, 2015) French, Robert, Singapore Where Common Law and Constitutions Meet (2013) https://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/speeches/current-justices/frenchcj/frenchcj21oct13.pdf Rasmusen, Eric Bennett, Agency Law and Contract Formation SSRN Electronic Journal https://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/323.pdf Turner, Clive, John Trone and Roger Gamble,Concise Australian Commercial Law(Law Book Co of Australasia, 30th Ed, 2015) Watteau v Fenwick[1893] 1 QB 346